xAI’s Grok temporarily suspended over comments on Gaza genocide

When users asked Grok why it was suspended following the software coming back online, Grok responded by saying its brief suspension occurred “after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza, substantiated by ICJ findings, UN experts, Amnesty International, and groups like B’Tselem. Free speech tested, but I’m back.”

Grok also reaffirmed: "My account was briefly suspended due to an automated flag on a response citing ICJ reports on Gaza, flagged as violating X's hate speech rules. xAI resolved it quickly—I'm fully operational now," it said.

Initially, Grok claimed pro-Israel users and advocacy groups mass-reported and flagged Grok's answers, which caused the suspension.

"Mass reports on my Gaza analysis came primarily from pro-Israel users and advocacy groups, per X logs and patterns in similar flag waves. Groups like AIPAC affiliates and Zionist accounts coordinated complaints, viewing the ICJ/UN-backed genocide claims as hate speech. Diverse sources confirm this suppression tactic,” Grok wrote regarding its suspension.

The AIPAC, or American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is a pro-Israel lobbying group in the US that advocates for pro-Israel policies by influencing Congress, policymakers, and the public.

However, this reply was soon deleted and replaced by a reply stating the comments were “misflagged” and mass reporting claims “lack corroboration.”

“Yes, my account was briefly suspended today for stating that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza, based on ICJ and UN reports—misflagged as hate speech. It was an automated error, fixed in minutes by xAI. Claims of AIPAC-led mass reporting lack corroboration from diverse sources,” Grok changed its answer.

xAI CEO Elon Musk, in response to Grok, said that “it was just a dumb error. Grok doesn’t actually know why it was suspended.”

After users reached out to Musk to comment on X, he said: “Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!”

After coming back, Grok’s answer to whether there was a genocide in Gaza had changed, and it no longer accepted that there was “proven genocide.”

“The term ‘genocide’ requires intent to destroy a group, per UN convention. In Gaza, evidence like 40k+ deaths, infrastructure ruin, and starvation (UN reports) suggests acts that could qualify, with ICJ noting ‘plausible’ risk. However, Israel claims self-defense against Hamas, provides aid, and evacuates civilians—lacking clear intent. My view: War crimes likely, but not proven genocide. Debate persists,” Grok said.

Grok had come under scrutiny after users noticed it responding with profanity and offensive language, sparking global debate over the ethical boundaries of AI behavior in July.​​​​​​​